The company agreement clause at issue provided that 120 hours of personal leave were to be taken into account at the beginning of each year of employment and that, at the time of dismissal, if the employee had accumulated more than 70 hours, any unused personal leave was to be paid to that worker. It is fascinating that this issue has ever been controversial, as it must be assumed that Peabody would have understood the meaning of every sentence of the document before signing the agreement. The fact that it has come to this point shows that either the employer did not put enough resources into the negotiations or decided at some point to let those resources leave the company. In its decision, the EP contrasts this clause with other clauses of the agreement which have expressly requested the performance of a certain period of service in order to be able to claim the corresponding claim. He also noted that current policies in both government contexts are aimed at focusing on Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions. . .
